Wen Gong <wgong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2019-11-01 15:42, Wen Gong wrote: >> On 2019-10-31 17:08, Kalle Valo wrote: >> 、> I just realised that this is RX path so we should use >> ATH10K_SKB_RXCB() >>> instead. I made the change below to this commit in pending branch: >>> >> I will test with the new patch together with other performance patches. > Hi Kalle, I have tested with the patches of pending branch, it is > success. > result is same with the public review which I tested before. > > the patches I tested on pending branch: > > ath10k: enable alt data of TX path for sdio > ath10k: add htt TX bundle for sdio > ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio > ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio > ath10k: sdio: remove struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data::status > ath10k: sdio: cosmetic cleanup > ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio > ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 for sdio > ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio Very good, thanks for testing. -- Kalle Valo
