+ linux-wireless Tony, can you send a followup patch to fix this as well? Kalle kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > tree: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git > master > head: b298800dd8ee7250bf04b4dbd151e1a971b6df91 > commit: c97ee3e0bea29827f4b44276fc792bd32977edb0 [89/97] rtw88: add power tracking support > reproduce: > # apt-get install sparse > # sparse version: v0.6.1-dirty > git checkout c97ee3e0bea29827f4b44276fc792bd32977edb0 > make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig > make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c:1440:6: sparse: > sparse: symbol 'rtw8822b_pwr_track' was not declared. Should it be > static? > -- >>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c:1008:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rtw8822c_pwrtrack_init' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c:2871:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rtw8822c_dpk_cal_coef1' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c:3112:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rtw8822c_dpk_track' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -- Kalle Valo
