Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:56:37PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> >> This reverts commit f170d44bc4ec2feae5f6206980e7ae7fbf0432a0. >> >> >> >> USB core will never call a USB-driver probe function with a NULL >> >> device-id pointer. >> >> >> >> Reverting before removing the existing checks in order to document this >> >> and prevent the offending commit from being "autoselected" for stable. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > I'll queue these two to v5.4. >> >> Actually I'll take that back. Commit f170d44bc4ec is in -next so I have >> to also queue these to -next. > > That's right. I'm assuming you don't rebase your branches, otherwise > just dropping the offending patch might of course be an option instead > of the revert. Yeah, I don't rebase my trees so we have to do a revert. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
