>> Hmm, yeah, I guess we could end up with a loop like that as well. >> Keeping the schedule_round would be a way to fix it, but I'm not sure >> we >> should just skip that station; maybe we should just end the round >> instead? > I am not sure. I believe, in some cases, the rest of the nodes which > could be most of the nodes in the tree will not have the chance to be > scheduled in this round. My guess would be that it doesn't really matter, because in most cases each schedule round will only actually end up queueing packets from one or two stations; as the driver will pull multiple packets from that one station which will often fill up the firmware queues (especially once we start throttling that with the AQL stuff). So I guess we can just skip TXQs that we've already seen this scheduling round, and let the v_t compare determine transmit eligibility :) -Toke
