On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 23:26, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:28 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 21:41, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > As talked about in the thread at: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=X7P2F1k_zwHc0mbtfk55-rucTz_GoDH=PL6zWqKYcpuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > ...when the Marvell WiFi card tries to reset itself it kills > > > Bluetooth. It was observed that we could re-init the card properly by > > > unbinding / rebinding the host controller. It was also observed that > > > in the downstream Chrome OS codebase the solution used was > > > mmc_remove_host() / mmc_add_host(), which is similar to the solution > > > in this series. > > > > > > So far I've only done testing of this series using the reset test > > > source that can be simulated via sysfs. Specifically I ran this test: > > > > > > for i in $(seq 1000); do > > > echo "LOOP $i --------" > > > echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/mwifiex/mlan0/reset > > > > > > while true; do > > > if ! ping -w15 -c1 "${GW}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then > > > fail=$(( fail + 1 )) > > > echo "Fail WiFi ${fail}" > > > if [[ ${fail} == 3 ]]; then > > > exit 1 > > > fi > > > else > > > fail=0 > > > break > > > fi > > > done > > > > > > hciconfig hci0 down > > > sleep 1 > > > if ! hciconfig hci0 up; then > > > echo "Fail BT" > > > exit 1 > > > fi > > > done > > > > > > I ran this several times and got several hundred iterations each > > > before a failure. When I saw failures: > > > > > > * Once I saw a "Fail BT"; manually resetting the card again fixed it. > > > I didn't give it time to see if it would have detected this > > > automatically. > > > * Once I saw the ping fail because (for some reason) my device only > > > got an IPv6 address from my router and the IPv4 ping failed. I > > > changed my script to use 'ping6' to see if that would help. > > > * Once I saw the ping fail because the higher level network stack > > > ("shill" in my case) seemed to crash. A few minutes later the > > > system recovered itself automatically. https://crbug.com/984593 if > > > you want more details. > > > * Sometimes while I was testing I saw "Fail WiFi 1" indicating a > > > transitory failure. Usually this was an association failure, but in > > > one case I saw the device do "Firmware wakeup failed" after I > > > triggered the reset. This caused the driver to trigger a re-reset > > > of itself which eventually recovered things. This was good because > > > it was an actual test of the normal reset flow (not the one > > > triggered via sysfs). > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - s/routnine/routine (Brian Norris, Matthias Kaehlcke). > > > - s/contining/containing (Matthias Kaehlcke). > > > - Add Matthias Reviewed-by tag. > > > - Removed clear_bit() calls and old comment (Brian Norris). > > > - Explicit CC of Andreas Fenkart. > > > - Explicit CC of Brian Norris. > > > - Add "Fixes" pointing at the commit Brian talked about. > > > - Add Brian's Reviewed-by tag. > > > > > > Douglas Anderson (2): > > > mmc: core: Add sdio_trigger_replug() API > > > mwifiex: Make use of the new sdio_trigger_replug() API to reset > > > > > > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-- > > > drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c | 20 +++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 16 +----------- > > > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 15 ++++++++++- > > > include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h | 2 ++ > > > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Doug, thanks for sending this! > > > > As you know, I have been working on additional changes for SDIO > > suspend/resume (still WIP and not ready for sharing) and this series > > is related. > > > > The thing is, that even during system suspend/resume, synchronizations > > are needed between the different layers (mmc host, mmc core and > > sdio-funcs), which is common to the problem you want to solve. > > > > That said, I need to scratch my head a bit more before I can provide > > you some feedback on $subject series. Moreover, it's vacation period > > at my side so things are moving a bit slower. Please be patient. > > I had kinda forgotten about this series after we landed it locally in > Chrome OS, but I realized that it never got resolved upstream. Any > chance your head has been sufficiently scratched and you're now happy > with $subject series? ;-) It's still on my TODO list. Apologize for the delay, but I still need more time to look into it, possibly later this week. In any case, let's make sure we get this problem resolved for v5.5. Kind regards Uffe
