Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Wen Gong <wgong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The bottleneck of throughout on sdio chip is the bus bandwidth, to the
>> patches are all to increase the use ratio of sdio bus.
>>
>> udp-rx udp-tx tcp-rx tcp-tx
>> without patches(Mbps) 320 180 170 151
>> with patches(Mbps) 450 410 400 320
>>
>> These patches only affect sdio bus chip, explanation is mentioned in each
>> patch's commit log.
>
> I tried to apply patches 2-8, patch 2 had a conflict due to my changes
> and patch 8 didn't apply at all. Also I saw few warnings with the
> patches I was able to test:
>
> $ ath10k-check
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htc.c: In function 'ath10k_htc_bundle_tx_work':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htc.c:796:24: warning: variable 'eid'
> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:2169:6: warning: no previous
> prototype for 'ath10k_sdio_check_fw_reg' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c: In function 'ath10k_sdio_check_fw_reg':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:2171:6: warning: variable 'ret'
> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c: In function 'ath10k_sdio_fw_crashed_dump':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:2434:17: warning: too many
> arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:2169:6: warning: symbol
> 'ath10k_sdio_check_fw_reg' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c: In function 'ath10k_sdio_fw_crashed_dump':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:2434:17: warning: too many
> arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:734: braces {} are not
> necessary for single statement blocks
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c:969: braces {} are not
> necessary for single statement blocks
Actually some of the warnings are from another patch.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
