Tony Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> >> <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > This patch set includes two patches to improve PCI interrupt routine. >> > One is to reduce HW IRQ time, the other is to enable MSI. >> > >> > The patches can be found at: >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11114043/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11126007/ >> > >> > They were rebased properly to resolve conflicts. >> >> In the future, please use version markings ("v2", "v3" etc) in the >> Subject and not something like "rebased". This makes my life easier as I >> can immeaditely see what is the latest version I should take. >> > > Oh, I just combine two patches with different version markings. > And I don't know how to write a proper subject in this case, maybe > I shouldn't use cover latter? The cover letter was helpful, please continue using that. IIRC the separate patches were v3 and v4, so using v5 would have been clear for me. But no need to resend because of this, just trying to streamline the process and optimise my time :) -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
