On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:02 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 00:35 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > > > > Is this supposed to work at all? AFAICS, in hwsim channel matching > > checks are only done in non-mediumd path (no_nl), and wmediumd also > > doesn't have any checks? So, hostapd responds to all probe requests in all > > channels. Am I missing something? > > Hmm. Interesting observation, I wasn't aware of that. > > That certainly explains the situation though - on 2.4 GHz we'd prefer > using the DS Element, and thus not use the scan result, while on 5 GHz > we assume that the reported RX frequency is correct (there's no channel > overlap). > > Still doesn't explain why it should work in 4.17 and not in 4.18, there > aren't a lot of wifi changes there at all. Yes the git log also doesn't show any changes in this area. > > I guess we should fix that in hwsim, anyone esle want to? :-) I can give it a try to move the channel matching logic to common code for both nl and no_nl.
