пт, 23 авг. 2019 г. в 22:00, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:07:26PM +0300, Dmitry Tunin wrote: > > Russian entry is incorrect. According to the last regulations document of Feb 29, 2016, > > 160 MHz channels and 802.11ad are allowed. > > > > http://rfs-rf.ru/upload/medialibrary/c1a/prilozhenie-1-k-resheniyu-gkrch-_-16_36_03.pdf > > > > Note that there was never a DFS requirement in Russia, but always was > > NO-OUTDOOR on 5GHz. > > Maximum power is 200mW that is ~23dBm on all 5GHz channels. > > Also Russia has never been regulated by ETSI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > db.txt | 10 ++++------ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > index 37393e6..d95ed5e 100644 > > --- a/db.txt > > +++ b/db.txt > > @@ -1097,14 +1097,12 @@ country RS: DFS-ETSI > > # 60 GHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > > (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > > > > -country RU: DFS-ETSI > > +country RU: > > (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > > - (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW > > - (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW > > - (5650 - 5730 @ 80), (30), DFS > > - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > > + (5170 - 5350 @ 160), (23), NO-OUTDOOR > > + (5650 - 5850 @ 160), (23), NO-OUTDOOR > > Based on the translation I've read of the document you've linked to as > well as a couple of others, it sounds like the use of these ranges > requires TPC. Since TPC is not supported in Linux, we need to reduce the > max EIRP for these ranges to 20 dBm. > > While modifying them, let's also update the 5170-5350 range to 5150-5350 > to match the regulations. It is not very clearly stated, but I agree that it looks like TPC. Where is it stated that we need 20 dBm on these ranges if they require TPC? Unfortunately I don't have devices with OEM software certified in Russia to see what is the limit.
