On July 24, 2019 11:35:14 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Arend,
After all the discussion, I think we want this?
I think so yes. Even if it is just informational for user-space it seems to
make sense for kernel side.
Care to resend?
Will do.
I think I want it at least because we shouldn't advertise HT/VHT on 6
GHz as is (just as part of HE) and that's easier if we have a different
band enum, for the capability storage...
Right.
The only place I could find an
issue with this is in cfg80211_wext_freq(). Not sure how to deal with
that so it is not part of this series.
Just finally break wext and say if you want to use 6 GHz you need to use
nl80211? :)
Probably is true for he support as well. Not sure. Have not been using wext
for the last decade ;-)
Regards,
Arend
