On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:01:33PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:05:07PM +0000, Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > On 7/19/2019 5:16 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote: > > > > > > <Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2019年7月19日周五 下午7:34写道: > > >> > > >> On 7/19/2019 1:40 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Merge the combo use of memcpy and le32_to_cpus. > > >>> Use get_unaligned_le32 instead. > > >>> This simplifies the code. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>> --- > > >>> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 3 +-- > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c > > >>> index d72fdd333050..12fb4add05ec 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c > > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c > > >>> @@ -1038,8 +1038,7 @@ void wilc_wfi_p2p_rx(struct wilc_vif *vif, u8 *buff, u32 size) > > >>> s32 freq; > > >>> __le16 fc; > > >>> > > >>> - memcpy(&header, (buff - HOST_HDR_OFFSET), HOST_HDR_OFFSET); > > >>> - le32_to_cpus(&header); > > >>> + header = get_unaligned_le32(buff - HOST_HDR_OFFSET); > > >>> pkt_offset = GET_PKT_OFFSET(header); > > >>> > > >>> if (pkt_offset & IS_MANAGMEMENT_CALLBACK) { > > >>> > > >> > > >> Thanks for sending the patches. > > >> > > >> The code change looks okay to me. Just a minor comment, avoid the use of > > >> same subject line for different patches. > > > > > > These two patches are in the same subsystem and solve the same problem. > > > I splitted them into two patches by mistake since I did not notice the problems > > > in the second patch when I sent the first one. > > > Should I merge the two patches and resend? > > > > > > > Yes, please go ahead, merge the patches and send the updated version. > > > > This is wrong advice. Don't merge the patches because they are for > different drivers. The original subjects are fine because the > subsystems are different so that's okay. > Oh... My bad... I was looking at the wrong patches. :P You are 100% correct Ajay. Merge the two patches and always make sure to not send multiple patches with the same subject. regards, dan carpenter