On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:05:59PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> In contrast to mt76_wr() which we use to program registers,
> on mt76_wr_copy() we should not change endian of the data.
>
> Fixes: b40b15e1521f ("mt76: add usb support to mt76 layer")
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c
> index 87ecbe290f99..db90ec6b8775 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c
> @@ -165,11 +165,11 @@ static void mt76u_copy(struct mt76_dev *dev, u32 offset,
>
> mutex_lock(&usb->usb_ctrl_mtx);
> for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(len, 4); i++) {
> - put_unaligned_le32(val[i], usb->data);
> + put_unaligned(val[i], usb->data);
This is bug as put_unaligned() use size based second argument
pointer type, correct version should looks like this:
put_unaligned(val[i], (u32 *) usb->data);
Stanislaw
