On 2019-07-02 17:40, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There are several occasions where a negative cid value is passed
into wil_cid_valid and this is converted into a u8 causing the
range check of cid >= 0 to always succeed. Fix this by making
the cid argument an int to handle any -ve error value of cid.
An example of this behaviour is in wil_cfg80211_dump_station,
where cid is assigned -ENOENT if the call to wil_find_cid_by_idx
fails, and this -ve value is passed to wil_cid_valid. I believe
that the conversion of -ENOENT to the u8 value 254 which is
greater than wil->max_assoc_sta causes wil_find_cid_by_idx to
currently work fine, but I think is by luck and not the
intended behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
index 6f456b311a39..25a1adcb38eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static inline void wil_c(struct wil6210_priv
*wil, u32 reg, u32 val)
/**
* wil_cid_valid - check cid is valid
*/
-static inline bool wil_cid_valid(struct wil6210_priv *wil, u8 cid)
+static inline bool wil_cid_valid(struct wil6210_priv *wil, int cid)
{
return (cid >= 0 && cid < wil->max_assoc_sta);
}
Reviewed-by: Maya Erez <merez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Maya Erez
Qualcomm Israel, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
