On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 19:08 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> > Can you explain how starvation happens? In what scenarios? With or >> > without aggregation? >> >> for (queue = 0; queue < QD_NUM(hw); queue++) >> >> This always starts 0 prioritize dequeue the first frame. But what we >> need is RR and let HW to prioritize the transmission according AC > > That's from the old code not having real MQ though, right? I'm totally > not concerned about that. Correct. The bottom line is that correct behavior MQ would be shift scheduling decision to the HW. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
