On 14/06/19 7:38 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:10 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 01:42, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> We want SDIO drivers to be able to temporarily stop retuning when the >>> driver knows that the SDIO card is not in a state where retuning will >>> work (maybe because the card is asleep). We'll move the relevant >>> functions to a place where drivers can call them. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This looks good to me. >> >> BTW, seems like this series is best funneled via my mmc tree, no? In >> such case, I need acks for the brcmfmac driver patches. > > For patch #1 I think it could just go in directly to the wireless > tree. It should be fine to land the rest of the patches separately. > > For patch #2 - #5 then what you say makes sense to me. I suppose > you'd want at least a Reviewed-by from Arend and an Ack from Kalle on > the Broadcom patches? > > I'd also suggest that we Cc stable explicitly when applying. That's > easy for #2 and #3 since they have a Fixes tag. For #4 and #5 I guess > the question is how far back to go. Maybe Adrian has an opinion here > since I think he's the one who experienced these problems. V4 seemed to apply cleanly back to v4.18
