Tony Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-wireless-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:linux-wireless-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >> yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 3:55 PM >> To: kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [PATCH 00/11] rtw88: power index setting routine updates and fixes >> > > ... > >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c | 112 ++ >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 26 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h | 27 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 1298 >> +++++++++++--------- >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.h | 18 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/regd.c | 69 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/regd.h | 4 + >> .../net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c_table.c | 799 +++++++++++- >> 8 files changed, 1653 insertions(+), 700 deletions(-) >> >> -- > > Hi Kalle > > I am going to submit a v2 for this. > Will you suggest me to format the patches based on > wireless-drivers or wireless-drivers-next? Please use wireless-drivers-next as the baseline. I recommend to split the set, submit now the patches which apply right now and submit the rest after the dependencies are in w-d-next. But do note that I haven't had a chance to review your patches yet. -- Kalle Valo
