On 2019/5/29 上午 12:11, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On May 28, 2019 6:09:21 PM Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On May 28, 2019 5:52:10 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:18 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > In commit 29f6589140a1 ("brcmfmac: disable command decode in
>>>> > sdio_aos") we disabled something called "command decode in sdio_aos"
>>>> > for a whole bunch of Broadcom SDIO WiFi parts.
>>>> >
>>>> > After that patch landed I find that my kernel log on
>>>> > rk3288-veyron-minnie and rk3288-veyron-speedy is filled with:
>>>> > brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep: error while changing bus sleep
>>>> state -110
>>>> >
>>>> > This seems to happen every time the Broadcom WiFi transitions out of
>>>> > sleep mode. Reverting the part of the commit that affects the
>>>> WiFi on
>>>> > my boards fixes the problem for me, so that's what this patch does.
>>>> >
>>>> > Note that, in general, the justification in the original commit
>>>> seemed
>>>> > a little weak. It looked like someone was testing on a SD card
>>>> > controller that would sometimes die if there were CRC errors on the
>>>> > bus. This used to happen back in early days of dw_mmc (the
>>>> controller
>>>> > on my boards), but we fixed it. Disabling a feature on all boards
>>>> > just because one SD card controller is broken seems bad. ...so
>>>> > instead of just this patch possibly the right thing to do is to fully
>>>> > revert the original commit.
>>>> >
Since the commit 29f6589140a1 ("brcmfmac: disable command decode in
sdio_aos") causes the regression on other SD card controller, it is
better to revert it as you mentioned.
Actually, without the commit, we hit MMC timeout(-110) and hanged
instead of CRC error in our test. Would you please share the analysis of
dw_mmc issue which you fixed? We'd like to compare whether we got the
same issue.
Regards,
Wright
>>>> > Fixes: 29f6589140a1 ("brcmfmac: disable command decode in sdio_aos")
>>>> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> I don't see patch 2 in patchwork and I assume discussion continues.
>>>
>>> Apologies. I made sure to CC you individually on all the patches but
>>> didn't think about the fact that you use patchwork to manage and so
>>> didn't ensure all patches made it to all lists (by default each patch
>>> gets recipients individually from get_maintainer). I'll make sure to
>>> fix for patch set #2. If you want to see all the patches, you can at
>>> least find them on lore.kernel.org linked from the cover:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1075373/
>>>
>>>
>>>> Please resend if/when I need to apply something.
>>>>
>>>> 2 patches set to Changes Requested.
>>>>
>>>> 10948785 [1/3] brcmfmac: re-enable command decode in sdio_aos for
>>>> BRCM 4354
>>>
>>> As per Arend I'll change patch #1 to a full revert instead of a
>>> partial revert. Arend: please yell if you want otherwise.
>>
>> No yelling here. If any it is expected from Cypress. Maybe good to add
>> them
>> specifically in Cc:
>
> Of the revert patch that is.
>
> Gr. AvS
>
>
