Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 01/11] rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/29/19 9:29 PM, Tony Chuang wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Finger [mailto:larry.finger@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Larry Finger
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 11:17 PM
To: Tony Chuang; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines

On 5/29/19 2:54 AM, yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
their declaration in header file phy.h.

After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them static.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch does not apply. Using quilt to see what is wrong, there are 6
changes
that have already been applied.

Larry



These patches are based on

https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers
branch master

commit 6aca09771db4277a78853d6ac680d8d5f0d915e3
Author: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sat May 4 18:32:24 2019 +0800

     rtw88: Make some symbols static


It should apply, did I miss something?

I was trying to apply the patch to wireless-drivers-next. That may be my problem. The other 10 applied OK.

Larry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux