Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Read fseq info from FW registers and print it upon fw assert.
> The print is needed since the fseq version coming from the TLV might
> not be the actual version that is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> +void iwl_fw_error_print_fseq_regs(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt)
> +{
> + struct iwl_trans *trans = fwrt->trans;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int i;
> + struct {
> + u32 addr;
> + const char *str;
> + } fseq_regs[] = {
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_ERROR_CODE),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_TOP_INIT_VERSION),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVIO_INIT_VERSION),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_OTP_VERSION),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_TOP_CONTENT_VERSION),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_ALIVE_TOKEN),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVI_ID),
> + FSEQ_REG(FSEQ_CNVR_ID),
> + FSEQ_REG(CNVI_AUX_MISC_CHIP),
> + FSEQ_REG(CNVR_AUX_MISC_CHIP),
> + FSEQ_REG(CNVR_SCU_SD_REGS_SD_REG_DIG_DCDC_VTRIM),
> + FSEQ_REG(CNVR_SCU_SD_REGS_SD_REG_ACTIVE_VDIG_MIRROR),
> + };
Can fseq_regs be static const?
--
Kalle Valo
