From: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
The seen_indices variable is u64 and in other parts of the code we
assume mbssid_index_ie[2] can be up to 45, so we should use the 64-bit
versions of BIT, namely, BIT_ULL().
Reported-by: Dan Carpented <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/wireless/scan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/scan.c b/net/wireless/scan.c
index f347387f195a..2ea268ef1c43 100644
--- a/net/wireless/scan.c
+++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
@@ -1602,12 +1602,12 @@ static void cfg80211_parse_mbssid_data(struct wiphy *wiphy,
continue;
}
- if (seen_indices & BIT(mbssid_index_ie[2]))
+ if (seen_indices & BIT_ULL(mbssid_index_ie[2]))
/* We don't support legacy split of a profile */
net_dbg_ratelimited("Partial info for BSSID index %d\n",
mbssid_index_ie[2]);
- seen_indices |= BIT(mbssid_index_ie[2]);
+ seen_indices |= BIT_ULL(mbssid_index_ie[2]);
non_tx_data->bssid_index = mbssid_index_ie[2];
non_tx_data->max_bssid_indicator = elem->data[0];
--
2.20.1
