Johannes,
One other question. Does the mac80211 based drivers like
ath5k and ath9k support any form of proc output? I am assuming
that the NetworkManager wireless menu item reports zero signal
due to the absence of a /proc/net/wireless under ath9k. Is that
a TODO as well or should file a bug report against the Fedora
NetworkManager concerning that. I am assuming it uses the proc
to get the signal level and that is why it reports zero. If
I use iwconfig there appears to be a signal level reported for
ath9k.
Jack
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 03:52:14PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> I think that's the false positive due to the tx mq changes that people
> were talking about all the time. Please ignore.
>
> > Is this a known issue or perhaps due to may skb->cb patch for ath9k?
>
> Yeah it's a known issue, nothing with your patch, except for the PAE
> placement your patch is fine. And I don't understand that part of ath9k,
> it shouldn't need to look at that but rather ask the RC algorithm to do
> that job.
>
> johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
