Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/20/2019 6:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On 5/16/2019 10:57 PM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >>>> On 5/16/2019 2:04 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: >>>>> With ISC license text in place under the LICENSES folder switch >>>>> to using the SPDX license identifier to refer to the ISC license. >>>> >>>> Hi Kalle, >>>> >>>> Given the feedback on checkpatch (or spdxcheck) failures let me >>>> respin this series. >>> >>> Actually let's *NOT* respin and leave this series as is and ignore the >>> warning for the header files as Thomas wrote in his response: " So we >>> can fixup the documentation and allow // style for headers as well.". >> >> What about patch 3, should I drop that patch? Wasn't the conclusion that >> you need separately change led.c? > > Okay. Let's do that. Dropped it now. > Or do you want me to resend the whole series without patch 3? If the series applies without patch 3 (and I assume it does) no need to resend the whole series. -- Kalle Valo
