Search Linux Wireless

Re: SPDX identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/license-rules.html
explains why the comment style differs between .c and .h

On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 12:36, Arend Van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Kalle, Thomas,
>
> I added SPDX tags in brcm80211 driver sources. Although it is a
> no-brainer I decided to run checkpatch for the changes and quirky stuff
> started to happen. For all files I added:
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier
>
> but checkpatch started complaining I should use /* ... */ instead of //.
>
> WARNING: Improper SPDX comment style for
> 'drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h', please
> use '/*' instead
> #29: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h:1:
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: ISC
>
> So I edited all patches and ran again. And again it started complaining.
>
> WARNING: Improper SPDX comment style for
> 'drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/aiutils.c', please use
> '//' instead
>
> So now I am in a bonkers state. It seems for header files we want /* */
> and for c files we want //. For real?
>
> This is on wireless-drivers-next so maybe it is already fixed, but I
> think this should be fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Arend



-- 
James Hughes
Principal Software Engineer,
Raspberry Pi (Trading) Ltd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux