> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > This is a preliminary patch to run mt76x02_edcca_init atomically > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c | 16 ++++++++------ > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c | 22 ++++++++++--------- > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c > > index e416eee6a306..3a1467326f4d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c > > @@ -54,14 +54,14 @@ mt76x2_set_channel(struct mt76x02_dev *dev, struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef) > > int ret; > > > > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->cal_work); > > Since now you use mutex in mt76x2_phy_calibrate() you can remove > cancel_delayed_work_sync() and drop other changes from this patch > as releasing mutex just to acquire it in almost next step make > no sense. I agree with you, the only difference is in that way we will perform phy calibration even during scanning. If the there are no objections I will post a v3 removing cancel_delayed_work_sync and reworking patch 3/4 Regards, Lorenzo > > Stanislaw
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
