On 04.05.2019 12:08, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > ath9k_hw_reset() in ath9k_start() can fail, and in this case, > ath9k_start() should return an error instead of executing the > subsequent code. > Such mechanical patches w/o understanding the code are always problematic. Do you have any proof that this error is fatal? I think it is not, else we wouldn't have this line: ah->reset_power_on = false; Also you should consider that a mutex and a spinlock are held. Maybe changing the error message to a warning would be more appropriate. But this I would leave to somebody being more familiar with this driver. > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > index f23cb2f3d296..f78e7c46764d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ static int ath9k_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > "Unable to reset hardware; reset status %d (freq %u MHz)\n", > r, curchan->center_freq); > ah->reset_power_on = false; > + return r; > } > > /* Setup our intr mask. */ >
