On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:15:06PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > If everybody's going to decide now to hit on _me_, I'll point out that > > davem's MQ TX changes broke it > > Of course that's not strictly true, it had been broken forever, it just > happened to never show up before. And I mean forever, the original > devicescape code that got in was already broken. Sorry, no, I wasn't trying to blame you. I understand that this was a hard problem to fix, and it wasn't at all obvious that changes in one part of the networking stack would break wireless stack due to bad assumptions it had made, that had been hiding for quite some time. The timing is just very unfortunate, since if -rc1 had been delayed by just one more day so it could have incorporated it we would probably reduce the large number of regression reports; a lot of people who test -rc1 don't necessarily follow netdev or linux-wireless. I'm of course also nervously building -rc1 and about to test it, since I haven't had a chance to test anything since -git6, and I'm wondering if some other regression may have been introduced since then. Since it probably doesn't get said enough to everyone who works of fixing bugs/regressions, thanks very much for your efforts; I (and many other people) very much appreciate it!! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
