Hi all,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 4/16/19 10:17 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from falling
> through to case 0x1025, and erroneously setting rtlhal->oem_id to
> RT_CID_819X_ACER when rtlefuse->eeprom_svid is equal to 0x10EC and
> none of the cases in switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) match.
>
> This bug was found thanks to the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Fixes: 238ad2ddf34b ("rtlwifi: rtl8723ae: Clean up the hardware info routine")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update tag from wireless-drivers to wireless-drivers-next
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c
> index 6bab162e1bb8..655460f61bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c
> @@ -1675,6 +1675,7 @@ static void _rtl8723e_read_adapter_info(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_LENOVO;
> break;
> }
> + break;
> case 0x1025:
> rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_ACER;
> break;
>
