On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:47:24AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > > The interface /sys/device/system/cpu/split_lock_detect is added > > to allow user to control split lock detection and show current split > > lock detection setting. > > > > Writing [yY1] or [oO][nN] to the file enables split lock detection and > > writing [nN0] or [oO][fF] disables split lock detection. Split lock > > detection is enabled or disabled on all CPUs. > > > > Reading the file returns current global split lock detection setting: > > 0: disabled > > 1: enabled > > Again, You explain WHAT this patch does and still there is zero > justification why this sysfs knob is needed at all. I still do not see any > reason why this knob should exist. An important application has split lock issues which are already discovered and need to be fixed. But before the issues are fixed, sysadmin still wants to run the application without rebooting the system, the sysfs knob can be useful to turn off split lock detection. After the application is done, split lock detection will be enabled again through the sysfs knob. Without the sysfs knob, sysadmin has to reboot the system with kernel option "no_split_lock_detect" to run the application before the split lock issues are fixed. Is this a valid justification why the sysfs knob is needed? If it is, I can add the justification in the next version. Thanks. -Fenghua
