On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > > > > It is true because we have an entire buffering layer in mac80211 (in > > > this case at least) and never push back to the stack. > > > > I'm wondering if we should be? > > I don't think so? We'd just buffer packets in yet another place. But you do realise that you're giving up on the rich queueing functionality that Linux provides (net/sched), not to mention breaking certain applications that rely on congestion feedback? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
