On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:47:35PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 03:51:43PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > > + int idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > sq = &dev->q_tx[i];
> > > > > q = sq->q;
> > > > >
> > > > > - spin_lock_bh(&q->lock);
> > > > > - while (true) {
> > > > > - if (!q->entry[q->head].done || !q->queued)
> > > > > + while (q->queued > n_queued) {
> > > > > + if (!q->entry[q->head].done)
> > > > > break;
> > > > If you place done = false here you will not need additional idx
> > > > variable.
> > >
> > > As Felix suggested, I would set done to false at the end of the loop, after
> > > tx_complete_skb
> > Why this is needed?
>
> logically I think it should be the last thing to do on the current skb but
Why? This is only marker that urb complete was done.
> probably moving it before tx_complete_skb will not make any difference
It will not, since code is performed in the same tasklet.
Stanislaw
