Hi all,
If no one cares, I'll add this to my tree for 5.2
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/13/19 12:57 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c: In function ‘pn533_transceive’:
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2142:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (dev->tgt_active_prot == NFC_PROTO_FELICA) {
> ^
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2150:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c: In function ‘pn533_wq_mi_recv’:
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2267:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (dev->tgt_active_prot == NFC_PROTO_FELICA) {
> ^
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2276:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1230487 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1230488 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> index a0cc1cc45292..5961f14259e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> @@ -2147,6 +2147,7 @@ static int pn533_transceive(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev,
>
> break;
> }
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> /* jumbo frame ? */
> if (skb->len > PN533_CMD_DATAEXCH_DATA_MAXLEN) {
> @@ -2273,6 +2274,7 @@ static void pn533_wq_mi_recv(struct work_struct *work)
>
> break;
> }
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> skb_put_u8(skb, 1); /*TG*/
>
>
