Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCHv2 8/9] ath10k: Add new api to support TID specific configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sergey,

This patch add ops for set_tid_config to support TID
specific configuration. STA information along with the
TID config change mask to notify driver that which configuration
needs to be applied for this current command.
If the STA info not available in the command then the
configuration will be applied for all connected stations
in the vif. TID specific noack configuration requires
aggregation disabled and rate for the data TID packets
should be basic rates. So, if the TID already configured
with noack policy then driver will ignore the aggregation
or TX rate related configuration for the same data TID.
In TX rate configuration should be applied with highest
preamble configuration(HT rates should not be applied
for the station which supports vht rates).

Vif specific TID configuration will be applied for all
the connected stations except for the station which
already applied with the same configuration for the TID
through station specific command. Newly connecting stations
will be applied with vif TID configuration which will be stored
in ieee80211_vif.

Testing:
        * Tested HW: QCA9888
        * Tested FW: 10.4-3.5.1-00052

Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h |   7 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 602 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 529 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
index 27ec555..c25c426 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
/* Default Airtime weight multipler (Tuned for multiclient performance) */
 #define ATH10K_AIRTIME_WEIGHT_MULTIPLIER  4

+#define ATH10K_MAX_RETRY_COUNT 30
+#define ATH10K_MAX_TIDS        8

Is there any reason why you don't use IEEE80211_TID_MAX here ?

Thanks for pointing this one. Somehow I missed it. I will reuse this instead ATH10K_MAX_TIDS in the next patchset.

Thanks,
Tamizh.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux