Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> __sw_hweight8() is just internal implementation.
>>
>> Drivers should use the common API, hweight8().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> This patch should go to x86 tree along with 2/2.
>>
>> Otherwise, all{yes,mod}config of x86 would be broken.
>>
>> This patch is trivial enough.
>> I want ACK from the net/wireless maintainer
>> so that this can go in via x86 tree.
>
> Sounds good to me, feel free to push via the x86 tree.
Actually, can you wait a bit? Felix just reminded me that we have a
similar patch pending from Ben Hutchings:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10808203/
And it seems there are two instances of __sw_hweight8, at least in my
wireless-drivers-next tree:
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c: int i, nstream = __sw_hweight8(dev->antenna_mask);
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c: int n_chains = __sw_hweight8(dev->antenna_mask);
So we need to think what to do.
--
Kalle Valo
