On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Applied those now, I'll send a pull request to Dave with them. Once that > trickles back into net-next I'll apply the third patch (it doesn't apply > without the others), and then Dave you can take the rhashtable one. Thanks Johannes. > Let me know if you'd prefer I take the rhashtable one through my tree, > which really would be only so you don't have to track the dependency. I don't mind. > NB: it'd be easier in patchwork if you tagged all the patches with v3 in > their own PATCH tag, or put the "v3" tag into the actual subject (not > the "[PATCH 0/4]" tag because evidently patchwork drops the tags and > doesn't track them for the *series* just each *patch* ... so with what > you did nothing is visible in patchwork, even just appending "(v3)" to > the subject of the cover letter would've fixed that... Noted. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
