Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 20:11 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Expose the trigger-based PPDU SIG-A bandwidth to radiotap in
>> > the newly defined bits thereof.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > --- a/include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h
>> > +++ b/include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h
>> > @@ -291,6 +291,12 @@ enum ieee80211_radiotap_he_bits {
>> >
>> > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_NSTS = 0x000f,
>> > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_DOPPLER = 0x0010,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW_KNOWN = 0x0020,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW = 0x00c0,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW_20MHZ = 0,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW_40MHZ = 1,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW_80MHZ = 2,
>> > + IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TB_PPDU_BW_160MHZ = 3,
>> > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_TXOP = 0x7f00,
>> > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_HE_DATA6_MIDAMBLE_PDCTY = 0x8000,
>> > };
>>
>> Johannes, as you wrote the patch I take it that you are ok to push this
>> via wireless-drivers-next?
>
> Oops, maybe I should've split that, but it doesn't really matter much.
IMHO splitting does not make any sense, we had four changes to
ieee80211_radiotap.h last year so the chance of conflicts is low :) Just
wanted to make sure you are ok with this.
> Sure, take it.
Great, thanks. I'll pull this now.
--
Kalle Valo
