Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 00/24] rtw88: major fixes for 8822c to have stable functionalities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:21:13PM +0800, yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Note this patch set is based on the original patch set "rtw88: mac80211
> driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips".

The latest would be here, for reference:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10787651/
http://lkml.kernel.org/linux-wireless/1548820940-15237-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx

> These patches are mean to make sure 8822c chip to operate normal for most
> of the basic functionalities, such as power on, switch channel, scan,
> connection establish and connection monitor.
> 
> As the original patch set was sent 3 months ago, progress has been made
> by Realtek during the past months. Now we have tested on more chips and
> released tables and parameters for them. Also the chips are all
> programed with efuse map released for 8822c.
> 
> Most of the changes are about BB and RF, both control the tx/rx path.
> PHY parameters/seq and efuse info make sure the hardware is powered on
> correctly. And channel setting updates help driver to switch to target
> channel accurately. Then trx mode setting and DACK will make hardware to
> have stable performance to tx/rx to connect to AP.
> 
> Here tx power control is also required to transmit with a precise power.
> Otherwise if the power is too high or too low, the peer might not be able
> to receive the signal.
> 
> Finally, we need to report correct tx status for mac80211's connection
> monitor system, this requires firmware's C2H of tx status report. After
> this, users can use 8822c chips for more stable wireless communication.

Besides the comments I added (and needing to fix the out-of-bounds
reads), this series helpfully adds RFE 1 support, so the 8822C chip I
have works for some basic functions -- it's not too snappy, and I feel
like there's still plenty of room for improvement but:

Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

And except for a handful of patches (should look at patch 1 closer),
these all look pretty sane and helpful.

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I still need to pass back over the original patchset and try a few more
things out.

Regards,
Brian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux