Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 7:36 PM Tony Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 07:31:19PM +0800, yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> > > index 9ad052a..138515b 100644 >> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS >> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> > > @@ -12546,6 +12546,14 @@ T: git >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.g >> > > S: Maintained >> > > F: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ >> > > >> > > +REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw88) >> > > +M: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > +L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > +W: http://wireless.kernel.org/ >> > > +T: git >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git >> > >> > That tree hasn't been updated in years. I expect that's not relevant, so >> > perhaps you should remove it? I think these days, unless you have a >> > large amount of patches that deserves its own tree / pull-request, >> > you're probably just going to be covered by the wireless-drivers / >> > wireless-drivers-next trees: >> > >> > NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS) >> > M: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Q: http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ >> > T: git >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers.git >> > T: git >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git >> >> OK, I can change to wireless-drivers tree and send PATCHv3. > > I wouldn't list wireless-drivers directly -- you don't need to list > any tree at all, and the "NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)" entry will > cover you anyway. I agree, no need to duplicate the git tree entry for every driver. The top level "NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)" entry should be enough. -- Kalle Valo
