Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>> + struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>> + __acquires(txq_lock) __releases(txq_lock)
>> +{
>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
>> + struct txq_info *txqi = to_txq_info(txq);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>> + ieee80211_return_txq(hw, txq);
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>
> Maybe v6 had txq->ac here instead of just ac which doesn't compile ;-)
>
> I fixed it up, but I hope you tested a compiling version :P
Ah, right, thanks for fixing it! I think this was an artifact of moving
things around while rebasing for submission (I have another patch on top
of this series that I need to test first).
So yeah, I definitely have a version in my tree somewhere that actually
compiles ;)
-Toke
