Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC 0/4] do not use sg if not properly supported by usb controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:47:47PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Hi Stanislaw,
> > 
> > Hi :-)
> > 
> > > > Not sure what is the problem , but this patch set look like a workaround
> > > > not fix. If this an issue with IOMMU and sg, seems there is something wrong
> > > > in sg page mappings eigher on mt76 dirver or IOMMU driver.
> > > 
> > > The main point here I guess is we do not need sg if fragment number is one (e.g
> > > usb2.0). Moreover this can fix IOMMU reported issues.
> > 
> > So there if diffrence for USB host driver when we have one usb->sg
> > sengment and if we just pass the buffer via urb->transfer_buf . I think
> > most USB host drivers behave the same in such cases. For what USB
> > hardware/driver this is needed ? Perhaps simpler fix could be done
> > in USB host driver?
> 
> According to https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c#L1557
> single sg urb and urb with a configured transfer_buf are managed in a different way.

But this should not make any difference for underlying low level USB
host driver, since we map 1 buffer of the same size, just by using
different routines for that.

> Please not I have not received any confirm that this series fixes the reported issue
> yet :)

What is reported issue ?

Thanks
Stanislaw



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux