Search Linux Wireless

Out of order Re: to PATCH confused Patchwork (was Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Avoid OF no-EEPROM quirks without qca,no-eeprom)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greetings Patchwork admin/operator:

Patchwork didn't recognizing that the Re: went with the original [PATCH], even though In-Reply-To is correct.

This is because "[PATCH] ath9k: Avoid OF no-EEPROM quirks without qca,no-eeprom" <20181222060913.28434-1-cshored@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, there was a reply ("Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Avoid OF no-EEPROM quirks without qca,no-eeprom" <CAFBinCA3MTO=h9YpB0RkxSNy4ZpeYLOAuKTykAKz+68stAtMsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) which was accepted by the list before the patch.

It seems the list was refusing connections for some hours so my Bcc: to Martin Blumenstingl reached him long before the PATCH hit the list, and when it was back he's probably already on the whitelist for greylisting whereas I was greylisted.

I did look on the wireless wiki, patchwork site, and vger.kernel.org website to if there were any hints on how I could fix this, or who I could ping about it, but since I couldn't find such a link, I am posting to the applicable (this) list.

Regards,

Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux