On 12/17/2018 11:34 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 12:03, Arend Van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/14/2018 2:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:45 PM Arend van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
These firmwares are for the BCM4366 3x3 802.11 ac chipsets, which also comprise of BCM4366E or BCM43664 devices. Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel
This didn't add brcm/brcmfmac4366c-pcie.bin to WHENCE. I'm assuming
it's under the same license as the rest of the brcmfmac files? If so,
I can just amend the patch.
Hi Josh,
I was not sure this patch ever made it through. It did not appear on
linux-wireless list probably due to exceeding a size limit. So I resend
it as two patches on December 10th. However, I indeed forgot to update
the WHENCE file in that series as well. Indeed there is no license change.
Unfortunately I have only 1 device with 4366B1 (D-Link DIR-885L) and
it seems to have dummy NVRAM restored from the bootloader's copy:
1:ccode=ALL
0:regrev=0
0:ccode=ALL
1:regrev=0
1) Old fw 10.10.69.3309 (r610991) FWID 01-c47a91a4
2 GHz: very weak signal (about -79 dBm)
5 GHz: good signal & works stable
(this also matches vendor firmware behavior)
2) New fw 10.28.2 (r769115) FWID 01-801fb449
2 GHz: very weak signal (about -79 dBm)
5 GHz: good signal but huge packet loss
So the new firmware introduces 5 GHz regression for me, but I guess I
should not complain since my device seems to come with a missing NVRAM
regulatory info.
Is there any chance you know a correct ccode + regrev for D-Link
DIR-885L for any region?
Hi Rafał,
That is bad news. Is the packet loss in receive or transmit direction?
How do you obtain the info?
Regards,
Arend
