On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:08:44AM -0400, jamal wrote: > > The one thing i am unsure of still: > I think it would be cleaner to just stop a single queue (instead of all) > when one hardware queue fills up. i.e if there is no congestion on the > other hardware queues, packets should continue to be fed to their > hardware queues and not be buffered at qdisc level. Right you don't necessarily have to stop all queues but you do need to direct all packets into the qdisc. > Parallelization would work if you can get X CPUs to send to X hardware > queues concurently. Feasible in static host setup like virtualization > environment where you can tie a vm to a cpu. Not very feasible in > routing where you are driven to a random hardware tx queue by arriving > packets. It should work just fine for routing assuming your card does multi-queue RX. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
