On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:49:43PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ] Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete. It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var. This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by some devices/firmwares: 1) 60/160 (0xee32) Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36 After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60 2) 120/160 (0xed72) Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100 After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120 Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth") Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>Please mark your stable patches with: X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore This way patchwork ignores them and this saves my time. Thank you.
Will do, thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha
