On 2018-10-28 15:01, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
On 2018-10-28 08:48, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
4ms 223 (40%) 214 (40%) 109 (10%) 94 (10%)
4ms 337 (90%) 182 (8%) 23 (1%) 30 (1%)
So this looks like it's doing *something*, but not like it's
succeeding
in achieving the set percentages. Did you check if the actual airtime
values (in debugfs) corresponds to the configured weights?
No. Will check that.
Toke,
From above results, different airtime for each station is reflecting on
output performance. Unfortunately I don't see such tput difference, when
the tx mode is fixed in push-only. Even low weight station is giving
same
performance. Are you also seeing the same behavior in your setup? Could
you please share your results?
Not sure why low weight station (26us) is consuming more airtime than
higher airtime station. Below result is taken in push-only mode that
means only next_txq() ordering is followed.
cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/netdev\:wlan0/stations/*/airtime
RX: 0 us
TX: 980443 us
Weight: 176
Deficit: VO: 256 us VI: 256 us BE: -91 us BK: 256 us
RX: 0 us
TX: 2008512 us
Weight: 26
Deficit: VO: 238 us VI: 256 us BE: 24 us BK: 256 us
RX: 0 us
TX: 513287 us
Weight: 26
Deficit: VO: 256 us VI: 256 us BE: 1 us BK: 256 us
RX: 0 us
TX: 576746 us
Weight: 26
Deficit: VO: 256 us VI: 256 us BE: 10 us BK: 256 us
-Rajkumar
