On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Rémy Grünblatt wrote: > Hi, > > I believe some comments in the rate scaling source of the iwlwifi mvm > are wrong, as we have #define RATE_MCS_SGI_POS 13 and #define > RATE_MCS_SGI_MSK (1 << RATE_MCS_SGI_POS) Hi Remy, Sorry for the delay, your patch was not correctly formatted and since this is a minor fix in a comment, it slipped through my fingers. I have made a different patch to fix this, changing the hex values for the tables instead, because in the example we say this is about SGI, so I just set the SGI bit: - * rate[0] 0x400D019 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 9 NSS: 2 SGI - * rate[1] 0x400D019 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 9 NSS: 2 SGI - * rate[2] 0x400D018 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 8 NSS: 2 SGI - * rate[3] 0x400D018 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 8 NSS: 2 SGI - * rate[4] 0x400D017 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 7 NSS: 2 SGI - * rate[5] 0x400D017 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 7 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[0] 0x400F019 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 9 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[1] 0x400F019 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 9 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[2] 0x400F018 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 8 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[3] 0x400F018 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 8 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[4] 0x400F017 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 7 NSS: 2 SGI + * rate[5] 0x400F017 VHT | ANT: AB BW: 80Mhz MCS: 7 NSS: 2 SGI This is now queued in our internal tree and will reach the mainline at some point, following our normal process. Thanks for reporting. -- Cheers, Luca.
