Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:55 PM Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ath10k_wcn3990_clk_info and ath10k_wcn3990_vreg_info are not
> WCN3990-specific structures. They hold generic data. So don't name them
> with wcn3990 specifics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 34 +++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h | 8 +++---
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> index 8d3d9bca410f..c6254db17dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> @@ -46,14 +46,14 @@ static char *const ce_name[] = {
> "WLAN_CE_11",
> };
>
> -static struct ath10k_wcn3990_vreg_info vreg_cfg[] = {
> +static struct ath10k_vreg_info vreg_cfg[] = {
Ironically, you could sorta make the argument that this should be:
static struct ath10k_vreg_info wcn3990_vreg_cfg
AKA the "wcn3990" shouldn't be in the name of the structure (since all
snoc devices can have the concept of an array of regulators) but
wcn3990 could be in the name of the variable since it's possible that
different snoc devices could have different arrays. However I'm OK w/
waiting to do that part until we actually see a different snoc device
with a different array.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
