On 28 September 2018 07:29:03 CEST, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 2018-09-26 17:09, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: >> On 2018-09-26 02:22, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >>> Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> :( Yeah... I got confused with attached soft lockup in ARM platform. >> >Toke, > >Cause for the soft lockup exposed in multi client scenario is due to >mixed order of fq_lock and active_txqs_lock. In wake_tx_queue or >push_pending >case, driver acquires active_txq_lock first by schedule_start and >followed by >fq_lock in tx_dequeue. The same order should be maintained in sta >cleanup. >Below change fixed the issue. Ah, great find! I'll fold this into the next version, thanks! -Toke
