> > Actually, it looks like I kept those for association because I decided > > that we weren't printing them too much. It might be much nicer to send > > them all as wireless events though, thoughts? > > Something like IWEVASSOCTIMEDOUT. Won't it make wpa_supplicant go nuts? No idea. Maybe just a private event with a string? Anyway, I guess we can keep it as-is because it doesn't add much and hopefully we won't print it over and over again, though I have seen a case where mac80211 was stuck trying to associate again and again. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
