On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:46:02AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In some situations some netlink attributes may be used for output
> only (kernel->userspace) or may be reserved for future use. It's
> then helpful to be able to prevent userspace from using them in
> messages sent to the kernel, since they'd otherwise be ignored and
> any future will become impossible if this happens.
>
> Add NLA_REJECT to the policy which does nothing but reject (with
> EINVAL) validation of any messages containing this attribute.
> Allow for returning a specific extended ACK error message in the
> validation_data pointer.
>
> While at it fix the indentation of NLA_BITFIELD32 and describe the
> validation_data pointer for it.
>
> The specific case I have in mind now is a shared nested attribute
> containing request/response data, and it would be pointless and
> potentially confusing to have userspace include response data in
> the messages that actually contain a request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> ...
> @@ -251,10 +256,13 @@ int nla_parse(struct nlattr **tb, int maxtype, const struct nlattr *head,
>
> if (type > 0 && type <= maxtype) {
> if (policy) {
> - err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
> + err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy,
> + extack);
> if (err < 0) {
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
> - "Attribute failed policy validation");
> + NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla);
> + if (extack && !extack->_msg)
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> + "Attribute failed policy validation");
> goto errout;
> }
> }
> --
Technically, this would change the outcome when nla_parse() is called
with extack->_msg already set nad validate_nla() fails on something else
than NLA_REJECT; it will preserve the previous message in such case.
But I don't think this is a serious problem.
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>
