On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:39 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:37:01 +0200 > > > From mac80211's POV it's just that select_queue must have known > > about the removed queue when the requeue is done. And we can defer > > the requeue to a workqueue. > > Ok. > > So you're proposing the requeue be deferred to a workqueue > and what else? RCU protection around real_num_tx_queues > access? Yes, I think we can fix it by deferring the requeue to a workqueue, using synchronize_net() and putting RCU protection against the select_queue call. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
